Real reason behind Deepika Padukone rejecting a Shah Rukh Khan film. Deepika Padukone was supposed to be a part of Shah Rukh Khan. They look immensely good together on screen and there is something about this pairing which puts a smile on your face. But later we heard that Deepika has let the project go and that ensued a string of speculations on what could possibly be the reason behind her rejecting the offer. Now, we can tell you that the actress had no other option but to let it go. Find out who has FINALLY joined Shah Rukh Khan in Anand L Rai’s next)We told you before how Mumbai Mirror had reported that Deepika had walked out of the film due to the date clash with Padmavati. A source was quoted by the daily as saying, “While Deepika was quite keen on doing the film, unfortunately, her dates were clashing with those allotted to Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmavati. Mumbai News. TOI brings the latest Mumbai news headlines about Mumbai crime, Mumbai education news, Mumbai real estate news, Mumbai politics and Live Updates on local. She’s an interesting and a wonderful actress, but when asked about why she was single, actress Tabu blames Ajay Devgn. In an candid interview with Mumbai Mirror. Novotel Mumbai Juhu Beach, located in the financial capital of India. A short walk from ISKON Temple, is an absolute beachfront resort property overlooking the. Shraddha, who essays the role of Mumbai's. Indian Films arrived in less than a year after the Lumieres first exhibited their cinematographic in Paris. In 1913 the first Indian feature film was released was.Since she has already committed her dates to SLB’s historical, she has had to say no to Aanand L Rai.” However, now DNA has reported that Padmavati is not the only reason behind the actress saying no to the project. A source revealed to the daily, “Aanand wanted Deepika to do the role, which is very challenging and would have requited a lot of prep and would take more time and commitment than she was willing to give at the moment. Also, time was a problem as she is shooting for Padmavati and travelling to Cannes for her brand commitment. So she declined the part.” Fair enough! Yes, we are disappointed a bit since we wanted to see the return of this pair on the big screen. But then we are ready to wait for Shah Rukh and Deepika to be in a film together. However, we can’t wait to see this film of Rai which has the superstar playing a dwarf. It’s unlike anything we have seen before and that has got us really excited. Inside the mind of Raman Raghav, Mumbai’s serial killer of the 6. The Bombay of the swinging Sixties with its glamorous nightclubs and jazz music was also home to another world: distant suburbs dotted with ramshackle shanties and huts, mostly peopled by migrant workers. And it was in these squalid suburbs that a terrifying wave of murders took place in 1. They were clearly the work of a serial killer: almost all the victims were miserably poor men, women and children and they had been bludgeoned to death by a hard, blunt object. There seemed to be no discernible motive. IPS officer Ramakant Sheshagirirao Kulkarni had just taken over as the DCP, CID, (Crime) in Bombay when he was handed this red- hot case. Deepika Padukone had a legit reason to reject Shah Rukh Khan's next. Real reason behind Deepika Padukone rejecting a Shah Rukh Khan film. Frenzied fear had gripped the suburbs and vigilante groups, often armed with lathis, kept watch at nights, sometimes battering wandering fakirs and homeless beggars on mere suspicion. Two thousand cops fanned out in the city on patrol duty. When found by the police, Raman Raghav turned out to be a nondescript - looking man aimlessly wandering the streets with an umbrella. Mirror Dildo Xxx Tube, he or she suddenly realizes that too much time and money was wasted in vain. Welcome to the largest free Mirrors Sex Tube in the world where. Xavier's College, Mumbai, (informally Xavier's) is a college affiliated to the University of Mumbai offering undergraduate and postgraduate degrees in Arts. When Kulkarni eventually did find the killer, he turned out to be a nondescript- looking man aimlessly wandering around grimy streets carrying an umbrella and a strange assortment of objects on his person (garlic, tea dust, scraps of paper with mathematical figures scrawled on them, among other things). He was spotted by chance by a sub- inspector who noticed that his shirt and shorts were stained with blood. The police interrogation and later, his confession in front of a magistrate, painted a scary picture of an unbalanced, strange man. His name was Raman Raghav though he went by several aliases, such as Sindhu Dalwai, Anna and Thambi. It turned out that this was the second time he had indulged in such killings. In 1. 96. 5- 6. 6, he had murdered nine people, most of them living next to a municipal water pipe line in the eastern suburbs. The police picked him up for questioning because he looked suspicious and had been seen hanging around the area. But the murders could not be proved and all that happened to Raman Raghav was that he was thrown out of the city and barred from entering it for the next two years. But he came back. Subject of Study. Over the years, the bizarre case of Raman Raghav has continued to fascinate writers and filmmakers. Kulkarni, who came to be known as . In 1. 96. 9, journalist and author Khushwant Singh wrote an essay called Portrait of a Serial Killer, which has been included in a recent collection of his writings edited by his daughter Mala Dayal. Filmmaker Sriram Raghavan (of Johnny Gaddar, Ek Hasina Thi and Badlapur fame) made a 6. Raman Raghav, A City, A Killer, with Raghuvir Yadav in the title role. And now filmmaker Anurag Kashyap is all set to release his gritty noir thriller Raman Raghav 2. Mumbai, with Nawazuddin Siddiqui playing a copycat killer. Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap is all set to release his gritty noir thriller Raman Raghav 2. Initially, he hoped to make a Bombay noir trilogy – after Bombay Velvet, there was to be a film on Raman Raghav and then on the sensational 1. Nanavati murder case. Now I find that has worked better for me!”Kashyap came across the story when Sriram Raghavan was making his own film. In the late 1. 98. Sriram, fresh out of the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) was approached to make a video magazine (in pre- satellite TV days, such magazines - - like Newstrack and Lehren - - were all the rage) on cops and crimes. And of course there was Raman Raghav.” This was the time that Kashyap met Sriram and found himself equally intrigued by the killer from Tamil Nadu who first came to Bombay in 1. What fascinated both Sriram and Kashyap was the idea of a criminal who didn’t kill for any of the motives usually associated with murder: money, love, revenge, pleasure. He rummaged in the dead man’s pocket, discovered some bidis and a matchbox and kept them, after which he ate some rice and rotis he found in the hut. In another gruesome attack, he killed a sleeping woman and then had sex with her. Once again, he ate some food that he found in the hut. Different Versions. In Sriram Raghavan’s film, Raghuvir Yadav commits the murders almost in a deadpan manner. He comes across as a shabby, pathetic figure, always in a soiled blue shirt, khakhi shorts and canvas shoes (apparently a Parsi Dairy delivery boy uniform), who suddenly erupts in rage over trivial incidents. Sriram had initially planned his film as a thriller. But when he met the psychiatrist who had examined Raman Raghav after the latter’s arrest, he changed his mind. That’s when I realized I was looking at him all wrong. Raman Raghav was unaware of what he was doing.”Raghuvir Yadav as the deadpan murderer in Sriram Raghavan’s film on Raman Raghav. When Kashyap was casting for his film, his first choice was Nawazuddin Siddiqui, mostly because Siddiqui is such a powerful actor and a favourite of the director, but also because Kashyap had the image of Raghuvir Yadav in his head and decided that his actor too should be of slight, unimposing build. But going by the trailers of Raman Raghav 2. If Yadav’s Raman Raghav seems almost dazed and uncomprehending, Siddiqui exudes dangerous menace. Siddiqui seems more in keeping with Khushwant Singh’s portrait of the serial killer as a man who was taught to rob and kill by his jailbird father, and who was a woman- hater (he’d been betrayed by his wife - - she became pregnant by another man - - and later by another woman who cried rape when he repulsed her advances). Singh described him as a man who needed his daily ration of sex and crime. Read: Raman Raghav 2. Madness meets mayhem in Anurag Kashyap’s film. Since Kashyap’s film is not about the actual events of the 1. Says scriptwriter- filmmaker Vasan Bala, who worked on the original script of Raman Raghav for Kashyap, “It’s a sad commentary on our times but it was difficult to place a Kulkarni, who was an honest, upright cop, in today’s times. And so Anurag came up with the idea of a cop who was a sort of mirror image.” In Raman Raghav 2. He is brutal to anyone weaker than him – because he can be. The question Kashyap seems to be asking is: who is the person in the ? Raman Raghav, who was clearly a mentally unsound man? Unsound Mindscape The original Raman Raghav was diagnosed with chronic paranoid schizophrenia. Kashyap elaborates: “There was a world that existed in his head – he believed India was being controlled simultaneously by a Congress- British- Akbar government that was out to get him and he had to fight these people.” He also believed that he was being forced into homosexuality and he had to somehow prevent this by killing people. At the same time, he was, as Vasan Bala points out, “a kind of scavenging killer. He killed poor, vulnerable people, most of whom were sleeping when he attacked them. He stole a few paise and useless odds and ends after he did the killings. Or he indulged in necrophilia. He never showed the slightest remorse.”Raman Raghav was sent to Yerawada Jail where he died in 1. Oddly enough, in all his years in jail, he was never involved in any act of violence. There were just moments in a continuum when he felt he should end a life.”What drove him to murder so many people? Why did he kill so indiscriminately and randomly? What was really going on in his head? There are no answers, only theories. It is an inconclusive story of a serial killer. Maybe Anurag Kashyap’s film will find one more piece of the puzzle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |